Scorecard
Is this thing any good. Separate from the ledger, which shows what happened to the money.
Sample far too small
0 closed trades. Below roughly 30, none of the numbers on this page mean anything, because a run of luck looks identical to skill at this size. Read them as a format check, not as a result.
Profitability
Computed from closed trades. Real maths on sample data.
Net PNL
—
Win Rate
—
Average Win
—
Average Loss
—
Profit Factor
—
Expectancy Per Trade
—
Max Drawdown
—
Win rate on its own is close to meaningless. A system can win seven times out of ten and still lose money if the three losses are large. Profit factor below 1.00 means it loses money. Expectancy is the average result per trade, and it is the number that decides whether doing this again is worth it.
Selection Quality
Was it right, separately from whether you acted on it.
Evaluated
0
Passed
0
Watched
0
Rejected
0
Passes Higher After 30 Days
Not measurable
Needs the price at the moment of the decision. Not being stored.
Rejects That Rose Anyway
Not measurable
The costly mistakes. Invisible unless rejects are tracked too.
The second one matters more than it looks. If you only track what you bought, you learn nothing about what you wrongly refused, and a system that rejects every winner can still show a fine win rate on the few it let through.
Versus Doing Nothing
A gain is only skill if it beat the alternative.
System Return
Not measurable
Needs a market data feed.
S&P 500 Over Same Period
Not measurable
Needs a market data feed.
If everything rose 20 percent and this returned 8, the numbers above would look healthy while the system was actively costing you money. Without a benchmark, profit and skill are indistinguishable.